|Browse Archives||About||For Contributors|
You are not permitted to access the full text of articles.
If you have any questions about permissions,
please contact the Society.
회원님은 논문 이용 권한이 없습니다.
권한 관련 문의는 학회로 부탁 드립니다.
|[ Original ]|
|Journal of the East Asian Society of Dietary Life - Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 1-9|
|Abbreviation: J East Asian Soc Diet Life|
|ISSN: 1225-6781 (Print) 2288-8802 (Online)|
|Print publication date 28 Feb 2019|
|Received 12 Nov 2018 Revised 04 Jan 2019 Accepted 08 Jan 2019|
|Structural Equation Model of Dietary Style and Dietary Guidelines for Pregnant Women|
Young Il Park ; Eun-Kyung Jung ; Joo, Nami†
|Dept. of Food & Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul 04310, Republic of Korea|
|Correspondence to : †Nami Joo Tel: +82-2-710-9471, Fax: +82-2-710-9479, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org|
Funding Information ▼
This study was conducted to analyze the effects of the dietary style of pregnant women according to their food choice attributes based on their level of adherence to dietary guidelines by establishing a structural equation model (SEM) for the relationship between food choice attributes and dietary guidelines compliance. Surveys were assembled from July to August 2017 and a statistical analysis of the 215 responses was conducted. The outcomes of factor analysis of dietary style, food choice attributes and level of adherence to dietary guidelines of pregnant women resulted in their being categorized into five, one and four categories, respectively. The evaluation model of the confirmatory factor test was also confirmed to be valid since the results produced the values of χ2=408.785, ICFI=0.915, GFI=0.905, FI=0.922, NFI=0.832, AGFI=0.831, RMSEA=0.058 and RMR=0.045, which was acceptable, and certified the appropriateness of the model. In an effort to study the food choice attributes in conformity with the dietary style and level of adherence to dietary guidelines of pregnant women, a SEM was composed and examined. All tests indicated that the model met the offered levels for the fit index’s goodness, and therefore, the all study model have proven to be suitable.
|Keywords: pregnant women, dietary style, dietary guideline, food choice, nutrition status
Diet is the greatest factor in lifestyle and has a direct and positive relation with health (Farhud & Dariush D 2015). Poor diet like using fast foods and its consequences like obesity and cardiovascular is the common healthy problem in societies (Mozaffarian D et al 2011). In the case of pregnant women, most of them experience distinctive changes in appetite and food preference and encounter a great deal of difficulties in leading a desirable dietary life owing to the morning sickness that affects food intake (Han MH 2014). In addition, their nutritive conditions during pregnancy are closely connected with the development of fetuses and infants, and thus may have an effect on maternal health and prenatal development, as well as even on baby health after birth (Thompson JM et al 2010). Accordingly, having a proper dietary life is critical during (Lee JA et al 2004). However, it has been recently reported that a considerable number of females at childbearing age in Korea are underweight, overweight and short of certain nutrients (Bae HS 2006), and that there is a growing tendency of high-risk pregnancy that hampers pregnancy maintenance and prenatal development (Choi JH et al 2006; Lee SH et al 2006). In this regard, it is required to explore a proper dietary life of pregnant women.
Consumers who purchase foods have a choice of them by relying on minimal amounts of information attached on the product indications, and perform individually purchasing behaviors because of belief that the foods will satisfy their preferences as much as possible in terms of taste and nutrition (Lee EB 2013). In accordance with studies for food choice attributes, Wadolowska L et al (2008) divided them into the following figures: they include advertisement, functionality, health, price, senses and socio-cultural factors. Also, Connors M et al (2001) revealed that the factors most closely associated with food choice were time, taste, health, cost and social relationship. These attributes were also used in studies conducted aimed at Greece (Fotopoulos C et al 2009), Uruguay (Ares G & Gambaro A 2007), Austria (Lockie S et al 2001) and Finland (Lindeman M & Vaananen M 2000).
Maternal dietary habits can immediately affect the growing fetus, and awareness has grew during recent years that maternal diet may affect the result of pregnancy also the long term health of the child (Godfrey KM & Barker DJ 2001; Kind KL et al 2006). The dietary guidelines are established according to scientific evidences for the relation between nutritive conditions and health, and provide the people with essential dietary principles based on foods to be easily understood and applied to their actual lives so that they can maintain health and prevent diseases (Yoon SY 2009). To help women accomplish a nutritionally sufficient diet during pregnancy, most countries have dietary guidelines that recommend the number of daily servings that should be consumed from each of the core food groups (NHMRC 2010; USDA 2010). The dietary guidelines for breast-feeding and pregnant women were designed to reflect their health-nutrition problems and dietary traits investigated by the national health and nutrition examination survey on the basis of the dietary goals and overall guidelines for Koreans (Jang YA et al 2008; Ministry of Health & Welfare 2018).
Accordingly, the present study was conducted to analyze the dietary patterns during pregnancy, and provide basic materials for desirable dietary life and nutrition education by developing a model for food choice attributes of dietary life and the level of compliance to dietary guidelines for pregnant women.
The sample populations are participants at three times of “Symposium about baby nursing for pregnant women” in Seoul from July to August 2017. The questionnaires were distributed to 270 people, and 215 usable responses were obtained, giving a response rate of 79.6%. Expected completion time for the survey was 30∼45 min in compliance with responses offered, and did not limit time for survey completion. Survey instruments, protocols, and the procedure for acquiring informed consent for this research were consented by the institutional review committees (SMWU- 1707-HR-064). Information about the study was offered and consent was got from all participants before completing the survey questionnaire. The 109 (50.7%) pregnant women were over 30 weeks pregnant period and 84 (39.1%) pregnant women were 20∼29 weeks pregnant period. Most of them (74.0%) had morning sickness and 26% of them had not morning sickness.
The questionnaire for dietary style was composed of 20 items with reference to related previous studies (Kim KH 2005; Grunert K et al 2011; Yoon HR et al 2016) and consisted of 5 items on food choice attributes (Lockie S et al 2001; Wadolowska L et al 2008; Fotopoulos C et al 2009). The questionnaire pregnant women’s level of adherence to dietary guidelines was composed with ‘Dietary action guide for pregnant and lactating women’ (Jang YA et al 2008; Ministry of Health & Welfare 2018) and consisted of 18 items evaluated with 5-point Likert scale.
A SEM was used to investigate the effect of pregnant women's dietary styles on their food selection attributes and the level of compliance with the dietary guidelines.
Hypothesis 1. Dietary style will be substantially different depending on the food choice attributes.
Hypothesis 2. Food choice attributes will be substantially dissimilar depending on the level of adherence to dietary guidelines.
Hypothesis 3. Dietary style will be substantially different depending on the level of compliance to dietary guidelines.
The assembled data were evaluated with SPSS 21.0 for Windows and AMOS (Analysis of Moment Structure) 22.0 Statistical programs. Exploratory factor and reliability tests were executed for estimation the unidimensionality of multiple items that contained of each factor. After assessing the validity of the measurement items by conducting confirmatory factor analysis, SEM (structural equation model) was used to find out the path coefficients of the study model.
According to the results of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on dietary style items, 5 factors were extracted (Table 1). The coefficients of Cronbach’s alpha indicated a reliability of 0.807, 0.826, 0.866, 0.704 and 0.725. and explanatory power was 66.104%. Factor 1 was called ‘Convenience oriented’, factor 2 ‘Economy oriented’, factor 3 ‘Trend oriented’ factor 4 ‘Healthy oriented’, and factor 5 ‘Gourmet oriented’.
|Factor 1||Factor 2||Factor 3||Factor 4||Factor 5|
|Dietary style||Enjoy eating instant and processed foods||0.852||0.807|
|Often purchase processed foods||0.742|
|Often eat delivery foods||0.733|
|Have bread and milk as a meal at a busy time||0.694|
|Save time spent on preparing and eating a meal as much as possible||0.666|
|Consider discount or event products first when buying groceries||0.834||0.826|
|Always check price when buying groceries||0.824|
|Buy groceries after comparing price||0.814|
|Buy cheaper product when quality is similar||0.737|
|Try to have a variety of foods||0.875||0.866|
|Enjoy eating trendy foods||0.854|
|Know famous restaurants and foods||0.812|
|Check ingredient, additives when buying groceries||0.827||0.704|
|Consider about nutrition when eating||0.731|
|Buy organic food||0.705|
|Periodically eat supplementary health foods||0.590|
|Put taste before nutrition when choosing food||0.757||0.725|
|Purchase if it looks tasty||0.741|
|Like to search for famous restaurants||0.645|
|Explained rate (%)||15.458||14.798||13.603||12.587||9.656|
|Food choice attributes||Factor|
|Nutrition is an important factor when choosing foods.||0.789||0.620|
|Sanitation is an important factor when choosing foods.||0.747|
|Price is an important factor when choosing foods.||0.624|
|Brand is an important factor when choosing foods.||0.609|
|Taste is an important factor when choosing foods.||0.602|
|Explained rate (%)||67.542|
|Factor 1||Factor 2||Factor 3||Factor 4|
|Level of adherence to dietary guidelines||Eat lean meat, fishes, etc. after cooking them sufficiently||0.890||0.861|
|Eat stored foods after heating them sufficiently||0.876|
|Choose clean foods when purchasing them and eating out||0.803|
|To reduce sodium intakes, eat less soup blandly||0.857||0.824|
|Eat Kimchi blandly||0.825|
|Use less condiments such as salt, soy sauce and soybean paste when cooking and eating foods||0.812|
|For proper weight gain, regularly perform suitable physical activities||0.813||0.707|
|For postnatal weight control, gradually start exercise||0.796|
|Drink enough water||0.706|
|Eat protein foods such as fishes, lean meat, bean products and eggs once or more every day||0.797||0.628|
|Eat often yogurt, cheese, fishes with bones||0.724|
|Eat a variety of vegetables and fruits every day||0.684|
|Explained rate (%)||20.410||18.626||15.865||14.565|
The results of the food choice attributes items as determined by the EFA are showed in Table 1. The items were named ‘Nutrition’, ‘Sanitation’, ‘Price’, ‘Brand’ and ‘Taste’. Reliability and validity were established by 0.620 of Cronbach’s alpha, and 67.542% of the explain power for the factors on the food choice attributes.
Table 1 describes the results of the 12 items of level of adherence to dietary guidelines as implied by the EFA. Four factors were certified and explained 69.466% of the results. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients for factors 1 (0.861), 2 (0.824), 3 (0.707) and 4 (0.628) named ‘Sanitary’, ‘Sodium intake', ‘Life habit’ and ‘Body composition food intake’.
The results imply that multicollinearity was not a problem with most variables since the highest correlation coefficient was 0.542 (Table 2). The highest expected correlation was between ‘Trend oriented’ and ‘Gourmet oriented’ (r=0.542, p<0.01), followed ‘Sodium intake’ and ‘Life habit’ (r=0.340, p<0.01), ‘Convenience oriented’ and ‘Gourmet oriented’ (r=0.31, p<0.01) and ‘Trend oriented’ and ‘Food choice attributes’ (r=0.316, p<0.01).
The confirmatory factor analysis for the measurement model are indicated in Table 3. Goodness-of-fit index results for the model are approved level for each index. And the model was verified as suitable due to the optimal results showed the values of χ2=408.785, GFI=0.905, CFI=0.915, IFI=0.922, NFI=0.832, RMR=0.045, AGFI=0.831 and RMSEA= 0.058, which accepted the suggested standards, and also certified the appropriateness of the model as well.
|Goodness of fit in confirmatory factor analysis||Optimum model||p>(.05)||<2||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||<0.05||<0.5|
As a result of evaluating the convergent validity based on the standardized regression coefficient value after the measurement model‘s confirmatory factor analysis, the following variables among those of dietary patterns were eliminated: ‘Have bread and milk as a meal at a busy time’, ‘Save time spent on preparing or eating a meal as much as possible’, ‘Buy organic foods’, ’Periodically eat supplementary health foods’, and ‘Put taste before nutrition when choosing food’. For the level of adherence to dietary guidelines, the following factors were eliminated because they failed to meet the standard value: ‘Drink enough water’, ‘Eat protein foods such as fish, lean meat, bean product and egg once or more every day’, ‘Often eat yogurt, cheese, fish with bones’, and ‘Eat a diversity of fruits and vegetables every day’, and thus the ‘Body composition food intake factors’ were removed. Consequently, the validity of the measurement model was secured. The t (C.R.) value for the standardized factor value of measured variables was found to be significant by exceeding generally 2.88 (<0.05), and the factor loading was also shown to be generally 0.5 or more. Accordingly, it is considered that the proposed models in this study meet generally the sample data. In addition, the concept reliability was generally 0.7 or more and the AVE was found to be generally 0.5 or more, thus the convergent validity was confirmed.
The results of hypothetical model fit shows as χ2=423.837, IFI=0.917, CFI=0.915, GFI=0.872, AGFI=0.828, NFI=0.826, RMSEA=0.059 and RMR=0.049 (Table 4). Although the χ2 value was unveiled to be inadequate, the current hypothetical model in Fig. 1 was identified to be adequate since the other indices like CMIN/DF, IFI, CFI and RMR were revealed to be appropriate, and GFI, GFI, AGFI and NFI satisfied the suggested standards.
|Goodness of fit criteria||p>(.05)||<2||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||.90∼1||<0.05||<0.5|
This study analyzes the effects of the dietary style of pregnant women according to their food choice attributes on their level of compliance dietary guidelines through the construction of a model on the relationship between food choice attributes and level of adherence to dietary guidelines.
The results of testing Hypothesis 1: For the food choice attributes by dietary pattern, those were found to be not significant in all factors. But it was shown that the convenience and economy oriented pattern had a negative effect on the food choice attributes, and that the trend oriented, health oriented and taste oriented pattern had a positive effect on them. Englund-Ögge L et al (2014) indicated that increasing uptake of foods related a prudent dietary pattern is more important than totally excluding fast food, processed food, junk food, and snacks. Also, Lee EB (2013) reported that consumers checked more carefully all items of the product indications such as expiration date, price, packaging, manufacturer, main ingredient, food additive and nutrient after pregnancy than before, thus indicating that pregnancy has a great impact on purchasing foods.
The results of testing Hypothesis 2: The food choice attributes affected positively all the factors of the level of adherence to dietary life, in particular, exerted significant influence on the sanitation factor by 0.210 (p<0.05). Yoon SY (2009) revealed that ‘choose safe foods and manage them in a sanitary way’ among the adherence attitudes of pregnant women to dietary guidelines accounted for 70.8% and showed a relatively higher percentage. In addition, Kim KD & Lee JY (2010) found that housewives selected as a subject in the study usually required lots of information on food safety. Moreover, Lee EB (2013) also reported that, concerning the necessity of food safety education for pregnant, 97.8% of subjects responded ‘very necessary’ and ‘necessary’. It is believed that a wider access to food safety information was not sufficiently provided to pregnant women as much as they thought.
The results of testing Hypothesis 3: With regard to the level of adherence to dietary life by dietary pattern, the convenience oriented pregnant women had a significantly negative effect on all the factors of adherence to dietary guidelines such as sanitation (—0.196, p<0.01), sodium intake (—0.179, p<0.05) and lifestyle (—0.404, p<0.001). In addition, the economy oriented pregnant women exerted also negative influence on all the factors of the level of adherence to dietary life, but those effects were not significant. Seiga-Riz AM et al (2001) reported nutrient intake problems caused by skipping a meal, and showing that, as a result of investigating an effect of it during pregnancy on newborn health, the birth rate of premature babies was 9∼10% in case of having regularly three meals a day, and 19% in the pregnant women who have only one meal a day. Ibrahim M & Forsyth S (2002) and Lebowitz SF (1992) reported also that skipping a meal during pregnancy impeded prenatal development. Furthermore, in a study for the correlation between the dietary life and health-related factors of pregnant women and their pregnancy results (Lee SL 2005) there was a tendency that irregular meals during pregnancy are observed higher in the premature, then the normal, delivery group. In this context, given that the level of adherence to dietary guidelines was found to be low in the convenience- and economy oriented pregnant women in the present study, it is considered that, for their healthy delivery and desirable dietary patterns, nutrition education should be required.
The health oriented pattern affects positively all the factors of the level of adherence to dietary life, especially resulting in a significant effect on ‘sodium intake factor’ by 0.452 (<0.01). It is known that pregnant women experience a physiological need to intake side dishes due to the excessive intake of grains, which leads to the excessive intake of table salt, and thereby raising the possibility of a rise in blood pressure, edema and gestational toxicities (Kwon OY 2015). Yoon SY (2009) indicated that 34.7% of respondents put relatively well ‘Avoid salty foods, and have a low-salt diet’ into practice. In addition, as a result of exploring the perceived significance for main considerations required in the dietary life of pregnant women (Lee SL 2005) it was found that they placed the most importance on nutritionally balanced menu composition, and followed by low-salt foods and healthy seasonal food reserves.
With regard to the level of adherence to dietary life, the taste oriented pattern exerted positive, but insignificant, influence on the sanitation factor and life habit factor, and negative, but insignificant, effect on the sodium intake factor by 0.057. Lee SL (2005) revealed that, as a result of exploring the taste preference in pregnant women, the preference for sweet, salty, hot, sour and greasy taste tended to increase more in the premature than the normal, delivery group and especially the frequency preferring a salty taste accounted for 55.7% in the premature delivery group and 46.7% in the normal delivery group, consequently showing that salty foods was more preferred than other ones. Thus, these results were shown to be similar to those of our study.
In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that the dietary life of pregnant women had an effect on the food choice attributes and the adherence to dietary guidelines. In this regard, desirable dietary habits are needed for pregnant women by providing them with nutrition education so that they can establish proper dietary patterns and give birth to healthy children.
This work was supported by Korea institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry (IPET) through High Value-added Food Technology Development Program, funded by ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (grant number 316063-3).
The authors declare no potential of interests.
|1.||Ares, G, Gambaro, A, (2007), Influence of gender, age and motives underlying food choice on perceived healthiness and willingness to try functional foods, Appetite, 49(1), p148-158.
|2.||Bae, HS, (2006), Body mass index, dietary intake, serum lipids and antioxidant status of young females, Korean J Community Nutr, 11(4), p479-487.|
|3.||Choi, JH, Han, HJ, Hwang, JH, Chung, SR, Moon, HM, Park, MI, Cha, SR, Oh, JE, Park, YS, (2006), Metaanalysis of clinical studies of pregnancy and delivery in elderly gravida, Obstet Gynecol Sci, 49(2), p293-308.|
|4.||Connors, M, Bisogni, CA, Sobal, J, Devine, CM, (2001), Managing values in personal food systems, Appetite, 36(3), p189-200.
|5.||Englund-Ögge, L, Brantsæter, AL, Sengpiel, V, Haugen, M, Birgisdottir, BE, Myhre, R, Jacobsson, B, (2014), Maternal dietary patterns and preterm delivery: Results from large prospective cohort study, Bmj, 348, pg1446.|
|6.||Farhud, , Dariush, D, (2015), Impact of lifestyle on health, Iran J Public Health, 44, p1442.|
|7.||Fotopoulos, C, Krystallis, A, Vassallo, M, Pagiaslis, A, (2009), Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model, Appetite, 52(1), p199-208.
|8.||Godfrey, KM, Barker, DJ, (2001), Fetal programming and adult health, Public Health Nutr, 4, p611-624.
|9.||Grunert, K, Perrea, T, Zhou, Y, Huang, G, Sørensen, BT, Krystallis, A, (2011), Is food-related lifestyle (FRL) able to reveal food consumption patterns in non-western cultural environments? Its adaptation and application in urban China, Appetite, 56(2), p357-367.
|10.||Han, MH, (2014), A survey on needed processed food development according to consumers with different attributes, MS Thesis Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, p61-63.|
|11.||Ibrahim, M, Forsyth, S, (2002), Nutritional interactions between mother and fetus, Pract Midwife, 5(10), p10-17.|
|12.||Jang, YA, Lee, HS, Kim, BH, Lee, YL, Lee, HJ, Moon, JJ, Kim, C, (2008), Revised dietary guidelines for Koreans, Asia Pac J Clin Nutr, 17(S1), p55-58.|
|13.||Kim, KD, Lee, JY, (2010), A survey on the housewives' purchasing behavior and needs for food safety information, J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 39(3), p392-398.
|14.||Kim, KH, (2005), Dietary behavior and related factors of pregnant women, MS Thesis, Yeungnam University, Daegu, p46-49.|
|15.||Kind, KL, Moore, VM, Davies, MJ, (2006), Diet around conception and during pregnancy - Effects on fetal and neonatal outcomes, Reprod Biomed Online, 12, p532-541.
|16.||Kwon, OY, (2015), A study on awareness and purchase behavior of food for special dietary uses: With priority given to food for pregnant and lactating women, MS Thesis Konkuk University, Seoul, p67-69.|
|17.||Lebowitz, SF, (1992), Neurochemical-neuroendocrine systems in the brain controlling macronutrient intake and metabolism, Trends Neurosci, 15(12), p491-497.
|18.||Lee, EB, (2013), Pregnant woman's awareness and knowledge regarding risk factors for food and its influence on purchasing behavior, MS Thesis Kyungpook National University, Daegu, p48-49.|
|19.||Lee, JA, Lee, JI, Lim, HS, (2004), Maternal folate status and its influencing factors in early pregnancy, J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr, 33(2), p331-338.
|20.||Lee, SH, Kim, ID, Baek, JY, Kim, YJ, Joo, SH, Cho, SJ, (2006), A clinical and statistical study of pregnancy and delivery in the mid-teenager mothers, Obstet Gynecol Sci, 49(12), p2520-2528.|
|21.||Lee, SL, (2005), A study of dietary habits and health related factors that affected in pregnancy outcome, MS Thesis Hanyang University, Seoul, p124-126.|
|22.||Lindeman, M, Vaananen, M, (2000), Measurement of ethical food choice motives, Appetite, 34(1), p55-59.
|23.||Lockie, S, Lyons, K, Lawrence, G, Mummery, K, (2001), Eating ‘Green’: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia, Sociologia Ruralis, 42, p23-40.
|24.||Ministry of Health & Welfare, (2010), Dietary guidelines for Korean with action guides, http://www.fao.org, (accessed on 10. 9. 2010).|
|25.||Mozaffarian, D, Hao, T, Rimm, EB, Willett, W, Hu, FB, (2011), Changes in diet and life style and long term weight gain in women & men, N Eng Med J, 364, p2392-2404.
|26.||National Health and Medical Research Council, (2010), https://www.nhmrc.gov.au, (accessed on 10. 9. 2010).|
|27.||Seiga-Riz, AM, Herrmann, TS, Savitz, DA, Thorp, JM, (2001), Frequency of eating during pregnancy and its effect on preterm delivery, Am J Epidemiol, 153(7), p647-652.
|28.||Thompson, JM, Wall, C, Becroft, DM, Wild, CJ, Mitchell, EA, (2010), Maternal dietary patterns in pregnancy and the association with small-for-gestational-age infants, Br J Nutr, 103, p1665-1673.
|29.||United States Department of Agriculture, (2010), Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010 (7th ed.), Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.|
|30.||Wadolowska, L, Ewa, BZ, Jolanta, C, (2008), Food choice models and their relation with food preferences and eating frequency in the polish population, Food Policy, 33, p122-134.
|31.||Yoon, HR, Kang, NE, Kim, J, (2016), Knowledge, dietary attitude, and dietary behavior related to salt according to the dietary lifestyle groups, Korean J Food Cook Sci, 32(3), p333-341.
|32.||Yoon, SY, (2009), A study of nutritional knowledge and dietary habit of pregnant women in Jeonju area, MS Thesis Wonkwang University, Iksan, p5-6.|